NQ bullish

Locked Call · Nasdaq Futures · NY pre-market session

Locked09:01:38 ETFri, Oct 9, 2026

Target: 31,303
Invalidation: 30,953.50

Window: 4 hours; From the lock to 13:02 ET

The Read, as locked

Bullish, want to see us use the 4h gap

Recap

No recap has been published for this Call. When the author writes one, it appears here, linked to the original.

Lock record

09:01:38ET

Fri, Oct 9, 2026

13:01:38 UTC

Stamped by Docht's server when it arrived. It cannot be edited or deleted, by the author or anyone else.

Receipt: No. 7PFWYBA6
Link: docht.app/r/7PFWYBA6

Window

Window closed · 13:02 ET

Outcome

InvalidatedMarked by the author

The invalidation printed first, inside the window.

The author checked what the market did in this Call’s window and recorded the decision themselves. Nobody else at Docht reviewed it. The Call above is exactly as it was locked. This is a review, not a feed measurement, and it does not say whether the trader traded.

How this was decided

Only prices printed inside the window count: from the time the Call was locked to its window end. Earlier and later prices are ignored, including inside the lock minute before the lock time.
A long (bullish) Call reaches its target when price trades at or above the target, and is invalidated when price trades at or below the invalidation. A short (bearish) Call is the reverse.
A level touched exactly counts as reached.
If only one level prints in the window, that level decides. If both print, the order must be established from data finer than the gap between them. Otherwise the outcome is Ambiguous.
A single one-minute bar that touches both levels is Ambiguous. Do not infer the order from the bar's open or close.
Expired needs data that covers the whole window. Missing or partial data is never Expired: it is Ambiguous.
Use the contract the market names. If the contract rolled inside the window, the outcome is Ambiguous unless both levels can be established on one contract.

Docht proves what was said and when. It does not prove that anyone traded it, or made money. Not financial advice.

Discussion

Oldest first

Other traders discussing this. Opinions, not part of the record, and not financial advice.