The author’s own account. Docht records when it was published and links it to the original; it does not check what it says, and any outcome in it is creator-reported.
Docht proves what was said and when. It does not prove that anyone traded it, or made money. Not financial advice.
Discussion
Oldest first
Other traders discussing this. Opinions, not part of the record, and not financial advice.
A long (bullish) Call reaches its target when price trades at or above the target, and is invalidated when price trades at or below the invalidation. A short (bearish) Call is the reverse.
A level touched exactly counts as reached.
If only one level prints in the window, that level decides. If both print, the order must be established from data finer than the gap between them. Otherwise the outcome is Ambiguous.
A single one-minute bar that touches both levels is Ambiguous. Do not infer the order from the bar's open or close.
Expired needs data that covers the whole window. Missing or partial data is never Expired: it is Ambiguous.
Use the contract the market names. If the contract rolled inside the window, the outcome is Ambiguous unless both levels can be established on one contract.
A decision describes the market only. It does not show that the author traded, what they would have earned, or their skill.
@rod