NQ bearish

Locked Call · Nasdaq Futures · NY PM session

Locked14:43:14 ETFri, Oct 2, 2026

Invalidation: 31,281.25
Target: 30,356

Window: End of week; From the lock to 17:00 ET

The Read, as locked

I really want to see all those REQL get taken out during this week, then we can continue going for ATH

Recap

No recap has been published for this Call. When the author writes one, it appears here, linked to the original.

Lock record

14:43:14ET

Fri, Oct 2, 2026

18:43:14 UTC

Stamped by Docht's server when it arrived. It cannot be edited or deleted, by the author or anyone else.

Receipt: No. W6HQRTC8
Link: docht.app/r/W6HQRTC8

Window

Window closed · 17:00 ET

Outcome

InvalidatedManually reviewed by Docht

The invalidation printed first, inside the window.

A person checked an authorised source for this Call’s window and recorded the decision. The Call above is exactly as it was locked. This is a review, not a feed measurement, and it does not say whether the trader traded.

How this was decided

Only prices printed inside the window count: from the time the Call was locked to its window end. Earlier and later prices are ignored, including inside the lock minute before the lock time.
A long (bullish) Call reaches its target when price trades at or above the target, and is invalidated when price trades at or below the invalidation. A short (bearish) Call is the reverse.
A level touched exactly counts as reached.
If only one level prints in the window, that level decides. If both print, the order must be established from data finer than the gap between them. Otherwise the outcome is Ambiguous.
A single one-minute bar that touches both levels is Ambiguous. Do not infer the order from the bar's open or close.
Expired needs data that covers the whole window. Missing or partial data is never Expired: it is Ambiguous.
Use the contract the market names. If the contract rolled inside the window, the outcome is Ambiguous unless both levels can be established on one contract.

Docht proves what was said and when. It does not prove that anyone traded it, or made money. Not financial advice.

Discussion

Oldest first

Other traders discussing this. Opinions, not part of the record, and not financial advice.